I'm deep in the middle of a personal battle for problem framing above anything else. It's hard because, as a consultant, it seems that you are actively avoiding giving a direct answer.
People may ask you for something or define a need (Request: "Please introduce us to OKRs") and it's really hard not to look like someone who's deflecting the question or belittling the need (Answer: "OKRs are great but..let's have a conversation about decisions and hypothesis before talking about goals, shall we?"): my feeling is that no matter how good you are in in terms of "problem reframing persuasion" (and thanks for sharing a lot of good tips for getting better at it), it's a win-some-lose-some scenario anyway.
I'm deep in the middle of a personal battle for problem framing above anything else. It's hard because, as a consultant, it seems that you are actively avoiding giving a direct answer.
People may ask you for something or define a need (Request: "Please introduce us to OKRs") and it's really hard not to look like someone who's deflecting the question or belittling the need (Answer: "OKRs are great but..let's have a conversation about decisions and hypothesis before talking about goals, shall we?"): my feeling is that no matter how good you are in in terms of "problem reframing persuasion" (and thanks for sharing a lot of good tips for getting better at it), it's a win-some-lose-some scenario anyway.
Thanks for the introduction to Type III errors and for the funny dialogues 🙏 Bülent